久久精品毛片,国内一级特黄女人精品毛片,久久久久久久一线毛片,黄色一级毛片看一级毛片

Home About us News center Products Innovation Careers
industry news
company news
industry news
media focus
video
Firm brings patent suit against nine stretch film producers
 
 
By Frank Esposito | PLASTICS NEWS STAFF
Posted February 22, 2012

MEMPHIS, TENN. (Updated Feb. 23, 4:05 p.m. ET) -- A technology licensing firm has filed a lawsuit against nine plastic film producers – including some of the industry’s biggest names - claiming that they are violating a patent on stretch cling film.

Multilayer Stretch Cling Film Holdings Inc. filed six lawsuits against those nine firms on Feb. 10 in U.S. District Court in Memphis, Tenn. Multilayer is a Wilmington, Del.-based firm that bought the patent from global stretch film processor Manuli Stretch Film Group SpA of Milan, Italy.

The nine firms named in the lawsuit are Alpha Industries Inc., Berry Plastics Corp., Inteplast Group Ltd., AmTopp Corp., Malpack Ltd., Alliance Plastics LLC, Intertape Polymer Group Inc., AEP Industries Inc. and Sigma Stretch Film. Berry, Sigma, Inteplast and AEP rank among North America’s 10 largest film and sheet makers, according to a recent Plastics News ranking. Intertape is in the top 25.

AmTopp is a unit of Inteplast. Alpha and Sigma both are owned by Sigma Plastics Group. Alliance resells film for Malpack, but does not make its own film.

Multilayer is seeking unspecified past damages, as well as forward licensing fees from those nine firms, according to attorney Melissa Hunter Smith. Hunter Smith is with the Nashville, Tenn.-based law firm of Stites & Harbison PLLC, which is representing Multilayer.

If the defendant firms don’t agree to license the patent technology, Multilayer will seek permanent injunctions preventing them from making film based on the patent, Hunter Smith said in a Feb. 22 phone interview.

“We’re not sure how much film has been made using this technology, but we believe it’s a lot,” she added.

Paragon Films Inc. already has agreed to license the technology. The patent covers stretch cling films of seven or more layers. The patented films claim to be stronger and more versatile than previous films, and also claim to provide economic and environmental benefits because they can be made at a lower cost per square foot.

Officials with Sigma in Lyndhurst, N.J.; and with Intertape in Montreal declined to comment on the case. Officials at AEP, Berry, Malpack, Alliance and Inteplast could not be reached for comment.

No court dates have been set in the case. In 2010, Multilayer and Stites & Harbison won a similar lawsuit against Pinnacle Films Inc. That suit resulted in a settlement of more than $2 million, which was paid by Pinnacle’s bankruptcy estate. The firm filed for bankruptcy shortly before the case was to go to trial. Inteplast – one of the firms named in the new lawsuits - bought Pinnacle’s assets as part of that bankruptcy.

Manuli had acquired the patent in 2007 when it bought Quintec Films Group. Quintec originally had filed the suit against Pinnacle in 2006. Manuli recently stopped film production at its North American plant in Shelbyville, Tenn., opting instead to import products from other Manuli plants to supply U.S. customers.

The suits are the first patent infringement cases filed in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee since its selection for the federal Patent Pilot Program. That program is designed to enhance expertise in patent cases among U.S. district judges.

 
About us
company profile
company culture
version and strategy
company history
certification
patents
contact
News center
company news
industry news
media focus
video
Products
products catalog
technical support
Innovation
create value
production line
QA&QC
new technique info
Copyright:King-Tech China Co.,Ltd
河间市| 遂宁市| 漳浦县| 泸州市| 凤台县| 江津市| 玛纳斯县| 红河县| 于田县| 湖口县| 舒城县| 双鸭山市| 滨海县| 扎囊县| 清水河县| 修水县| 叙永县| 南充市| 杭州市| 烟台市| 千阳县| 丹凤县| 石狮市| 海原县| 玛纳斯县| 华阴市| 新昌县| 芷江| 门源| 兴义市| 汶川县| 康乐县| 芦溪县| 永胜县| 伊通| 兰考县| 京山县| 连云港市| 平安县| 澄迈县| 修水县|